Aug 9

The most recent example was TorrentSpy, a popular BitTorrent tracker that closed down last month after fighting a two-year legal battle with the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).

It’s unclear why none of the labels belonging to Sony BMG Music Entertainment were named as plaintiffs. The lawsuit said that some of the artists whose music was used without authorization are U2, Eminem, Elton John, The Beatles, Coldplay,wholesale jewelry, and Sheryl Crow.

“Defendant is well aware that the overwhelming majority of the sound recordings in its index are infringing,” the RIAA continued. “The overwhelming majority of the third-party Web sites that host these recordings do so illegally.”

Companies that allegedly facilitate the distribution of pirated content have tried to argue that because they don’t host unauthorized files they don’t violate copyright. That hasn’t stopped the RIAA or the motion-picture industry from filing suit.

The recording industry filed a lawsuit on Monday alleging that Project Playlist, a company that provides an embeddable music player used at MySpace and Facebook,LONGINES Watches, has violated its copyright.

“We make it easy for our users to create a playlist that points to a series of music files hosted on third party Web sites,” Project Playlist said on its site. “We do not control those third party Web sites. We do not host music files.”

“Project Playlist performs and reproduces plaintiffs’ valuable works (and induces and enables others to do so) without any authorization whatsoever,Cubic Zirconia jewelry,” the RIAA said in its complaint, “without paying any compensation whatsoever.”

Representatives from Project Playlist could not be reached. On the company’s Web site, Project Playlist said that it is “committed to copyright protection” and does not support illegal copying of music files.

The lawsuit against Project Playlist was first reported by Reuters.

According to a copy of the complaint obtained by CNET News.com, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) filed suit on behalf of nine record labels and accuses Project Playlist of making unauthorized reproductions of their music.

In the lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court of the Southern district of New York, the RIAA has asked for unspecified damages.

Aug 29

Ash Patel, executive vice president of Yahoo’s Audience Product Division

In January at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Yahoo CEO and co-founder Jerry Yang offered a sneak peek at Yahoo’s next-generation, socially networked user experience. In a Flash-based demo, Yang showed how Yahoo was opening up its platform to third-party developers and building hooks to socialize the experience for the more than 500 million users of its various services.

Patel didn’t give a precise timetable for introducing the new profile page or the social graph of the top 10 to 20 contacts based on address book and buddy list contacts and their “vitality” stream.

But that demo of socially enriched Yahoo services is still incubating, and the company has not been successful in becoming a social-networking hub. Yahoo 360, introduced in 2005 , never took off. A more hip version, Mash, was recently shuttered after less than a year. In the meantime, Facebook, which Yahoo tried to acquire for a rumored $1 billion in 2006, has accumulated more than 100 million users in four years.

In this screen from the January 2008 CES demo, Yahoo Mail shows messages from a user's most important connections as well as their status updates.

(Credit:
Yahoo)

Yahoo is focused on Mail–which has 275 million monthly users, according to Patel–as the core application to wire up with the social APIs. “People have their top 10 to 20 friends they care about. We have to take the latent social stuff, such as the address book with tens of billions of connections, and instant messaging, and buddy lists, and find the top 10 to 20 people who matter to a person,” Patel said. Yahoo is developing a new profile page; Yahoo 360 profiles will be migrated to the new profile pages, and those users will have the option of moving their Yahoo 360 blogs to other blog platforms, such as WordPress and TypePad.

“The profile page is a cornerstone. It’s a necessity but not a destination as on Facebook or MySpace. Yahoo 360 was a way to create a new profile with social networking. We didn’t get it right. We need the basic profile for users just to manage their identity so when they participate in other parts of Yahoo they have options to see,” Patel said. “We will go out in steps, with the first rollout of profiles in beta later this year.”

“We are taking existing products and services, making them richer, and enabling social elements for the audience, and potentially leading the way for new applications,” Chief Yahoo and co-founder David Filo explained during an interview last week.

“Yahoo has done well with taking a lot of user experiences that have taken off and doing them well so they appeal to the masses. For example, we did that with RSS. People don’t know what it is but we put it into MyYahoo and got wide adoption. We can put the right bits of social that matter and put them into products in the right way,” Patel added.

Patel also showed Netflix integrated into the Yahoo front page and integrated into Yahoo search. “In Yahoo Search, you can see the general Web critics view of the movie and the Netflix ratings, and you can add it to your Netflix queue. Instead of a bunch of searches, you can actually get something done there,” he said.

During a meeting with the press last week, Patel showed how Netflix, Flickr, and Evite could be integrated into Yahoo Mail. For example, an e-mail from a Netflix user about returning a movie could be turned into an interactive experience. Using the Yahoo Mail developer platform, Netflix can be added as an application in Yahoo Mail. A new tab appears and the application shows a list of movies that friends from within the Yahoo address book, who are also Netflix customers, have watched. Yahoo Instant Messaging is also integrated with the Mail and Netflix experience.

“Look at the hundreds of millions of people using Yahoo,” Patel continued. “Many of them don’t care to go to a social-networking site to build their profile. For them, we want to add the right amount of social to give them social relevance but not to duplicate Facebook or MySpace. They don’t want all features.”

Applications such as Netflix could be integrated into Yahoo Mail.

At the recent Yahoo Open Hack Day about 300 developers got access to new “social” APIs, which open up user address book contacts, profile data, notifications, and the “vitality stream” (like Facebook’s news feed) to external applications, which can be added to services such as Yahoo Mail and the Yahoo front page.

But Yahoo executives claim they are not focused on challenging Facebook or MySpace. They are seeking to add a social dimension to the Yahoo platform by intuiting a social graph and profile page for each user and opening up APIs that allow developers to access the profile data.

(Credit:
Dan Farber/CNET News)

Yahoo is heading in the right direction with its newly found openness and social rewiring, although it should have started this undertaking a few years ago. Now it’s a matter of executing on the plan, which hasn’t been made easier by the exodus of talent from the company in recent months, and getting developers and hundreds of millions of users to buy into the plan.

“We are really not interested in creating a social destination site,” said Ash Patel, executive vice president of Yahoo’s Audience Product Division. “That ship has sailed, between MySpace and Facebook and Hi5 and Bebo and other reasons. Even with that, there are 1.2 billion people on the Internet, and only 150 million are using social networks. That’s a lot of greenfield.”

Yahoo executives wouldn’t say when the user experience demoed at CES would be available, but made it clear that scaling the new functionality for more than 500 million users was a major technical and user interface challenge. Venkat Panchapakesan, head of Yahoo’s Audience Technology Group, noted the three top challenges for getting Yahoo’s social to scale: the complexity of mobile and making applications work fast for Yahoo Mail; data privacy, such as dealing with notions of user control at the same time data is broadcast; and converting all profiles to a single name space and lighting up the social graph.

Third-party applications can be accessed via the Yahoo Mail interface, as well as services recommended by friends. My Conversations is a way for Yahoo Mail to digest conversation threads and initiate actions, such as planning a dinner with a group of contacts. You can drag an e-mail thread into a map and profiles of those on the e-mail are surfaced, noting preferences (food in this instance), and suggesting and locating restaurants in the area.

(Credit:
Yahoo)

(Credit:
Yahoo)

Aug 24

UPDATED: What I failed to mention was that Microsoft’s original pledge was more constrained to developers in the OpenSUSE.org community and to “non-compensated developers.” In other words, developers too poor to worry about. :-)

But this is not a free lunch for open source. Sorry.

So, the fact that Microsoft is now opening up to any open-source development and non-commercial distribution is important, though not significantly more than it originally promised. It’s still designed to limit non-commercial distribution, which is effectively what the original proposal called for. I understand Microsoft’s stance on this. I just wish that it would change it.

In other words, there is no some news in Microsoft’s announcement as it pertains to patents and open source. None. Or very little.

commentary

It’s great news, and it’s big news. My company has been seeking this API and protocol information for months (years, really). But Microsoft’s pledge doesn’t obviate the need to negotiate patent royalties, if required, with the company. I do know, anecdotally, that Microsoft is offering very low royalties for these patents, and it’s also promising to more clearly delineate the boundaries of these patents.

Ina Fried reported that Microsoft was covenanting “not to sue over open source.” This, unfortunately, is only half-true. Microsoft did agree not to sue open-source developers, but it had already promised that before. [NOTE: My memory was a little fuzzy on this. See below.] It also said it would provide access to its IP to commercial open-source companies at fair rates, which is also not news.

Instead, the really big news is Microsoft’s commitment to open APIs and open protocols. That’s the takeaway. This announcement really has nothing little to do with open-source companies or developers, except inasmuch as they want to better interoperate with Microsoft technology (which many of us do because our customers require it).

Aug 23

The company needs to “make every kilowatt count,” she said. Chrapaty also said that at least one of Microsoft’s Virtual Earth servers, in Colorado, runs on wind power.

(Credit:
Rafe Needleman/CNET Networks)

Click here to see more stories from the Structure 08 conference and on cloud computing generally.

I find it curious that the two companies, Microsoft historically a pure software play, and Salesforce, a poster child for software as a service, are needing to solve the same problems today: building online applications and platforms that are reliable and open to their customers. And I especially liked that Microsoft is taking responsibility for the energy its apps use. I’d love to see that mindset spread through the industry.

SAN FRANCISCO–In consecutive talks here at Structure 08, we just heard from big brains at Salesforce.com and Microsoft on the topic of software vs. services. Surprisingly, these companies, which historically have espoused very different philosophies, are converging on a similar pitch: you can’t build one with the other.

In Salesforce’s case, co-founder and EVP Parker Harris said that early on, Salesforce’s architects wanted to build a platform service for consumers, not just an application. But business logic prevailed: customers needed an application, not a platform.

Parker Harris (center) of Salesforce.com, gets grilled by Om Malik (left) and Michael Copeland.

For its part, Microsoft is no longer thinking only about applications. It continues to build apps with varying degrees of local and Web-based functionality, and because of that, Debra Chrapaty, vice president of global foundation services, keeps a close eye on the efficiency of apps. Because when scaled up into a data center, computational-efficiency matters.

“As a technologist, you want to build a platform, but you risk losing touch with what you’re building it for,” Harris said. “So when we started, we said we’re going to build a service that’s fast, simple, and right the first time.”

Microsoft's Debra Chrapaty illustrates the point that Microsoft is a software-as-a-service company, too.

And once Salesforce did expose its platform to developers, it found it couldn’t think about its main app separately from this underlying architecture. “Software and infrastructure are not separate things. They’re one thing.”

(Credit:
Rafe Needleman/CNET Networks)

Aug 23

In its “Independent Insight: U.S. Technology Strategy” report released Monday, Goldman Sachs predicts that IT spending growth in 2008 will drop to 4 percent from a former projection of 6 percent and that pricing pressure on vendors is going to get worse.

Market share, brand, and size are critically important in a slowing economy, as the report notes. Pricing discounts are becoming ever more aggressive as vendors seek to hold up demand even as budgets shrink, which Goldman Sachs believes favors “larger solution providers that can offer attractive pricing and payment terms on bundles of products relative to smaller “best-of-breed” vendors that may lack similar flexibility.” The other group it benefits? Open-source vendors with no need to discount aggressively because 100 percent license discounts are already built into their product pricing.

All in all, it’s a fascinating report and a sobering glimpse into near-term IT spending. The big consolidators are winning, but so is the industry’s dominant open-source vendor, Red Hat.

commentary

Goldman Sachs has delivered some bad news for IT vendors.

Not surprisingly, Red Hat is the dominant Linux server operating system used by enterprises, with over 80 percent pointing to Red Hat as their primary Linux distribution. Suse Linux tends to serve more often as a second source, according to our panel. Perhaps more interesting, Red Hat is most often pointed to as continuing to gain share within users’ environments (44 percent of applicable respondents indicating). On the flip side, Suse is the Linux server OS most often pointed to as losing share within users’ environments (26 percent).

IT spending is expected to slow down.

In general, indications of software spending are marginally better than for overall tech spending, while indications for spending with Oracle looked better still. Linux is still making headway in the enterprise, with our responses showing Red Hat’s dominance may actually be growing. A first read showed a meaningful proportion [21 percent] of respondents planning to test Google apps, a negative for Microsoft longer term.

The reason? The report offers some clues:

Winners and losers in IT spending

(Credit:
Goldman Sachs)

I suspect that as much as Oracle’s broad-based approach is helping it win market share, Red Hat’s singular focus on Linux and JBoss is strengthening its hand against Novell, which perhaps dilutes its Linux focus with a range of other products only tangentially related to Linux. Even so, Novell’s Linux business has been seeing strong growth lately.

The good news, however, is that Goldman Sachs doesn’t see IT spending levels dropping to their 2001-2002 or 1990-1991 levels due to more rational IT spending from 2003 to 2007. In other words, we have don’t have as far to fall. The even better news if you’re open-source vendor Red Hat? Shrinking IT budgets are your friend.

Oracle is succeeding, with 35 percent of survey respondents indicating that they plan to increase Oracle spending, because it can aggressively cross-sell its vast product portfolio at a low customer acquisition cost, while Red Hat and Google are winning because they offer superior value propositions. Unfortunately, Novell isn’t seeing the same open-source bounce as Red Hat.

Where will IT dollars likely go? According to Goldman Sachs, hardware spending has likely already been cut as much as it’s going to be, leading enterprises to look to save money with internal IT staff cuts and lower spending on services. Services, however, are more likely to be cut for onsite services, with 50 percent of Goldman Sachs survey respondents indicating that they will be cutting services budgets: offshore services are expected to remain relatively strong.

Not everyone is losing out in the downward economy, of course. Goldman Sachs sees growing enterprise interest in Apple’s
iPhone, for example. Software, too, may be a moderately bright spot:

(Credit:
Goldman Sachs)

Aug 23

“We suddenly have an open field where current carmakers don’t know about batteries, or software, or designing these vehicles,” he said, adding that incumbent companies are still four or five years away from mass-producing plug-in electric cars.

To fleet owners, replacing trucks with rechargeable electric vehicles could simply be a question of saving money in the face of rising fossil fuel prices. They can also potentially benefit from government incentives for cleaner transportation, such as California’s zero-emissions vehicle plan.

Depending on who you talk to, electric
cars pack the disruptive force of either Dell PCs or the
Apple iPhone.

“We’re seeing a movement where people are demanding a product which is not there. People want a green car,” he said. “I think what we are going to see are people are going to take that risk because there is no other alternative.”

Regardless of your choice of analogy, the auto industry is facing the kind of technology-based competition it hasn’t seen in years.

(Credit:
Phoenix Motorcars)

Meanwhile, Think Global is making an all-electric town car, called the Think City, which can top out at 65 mph and go 110 miles on a single charge. Rather than try to compete with a typical sedan, it’s aimed at urbanites who want a smaller, fuel-efficient car, perhaps used as a second car. It plans to bring the Think City to the U.S. and is exploring business models where consumers can swap out batteries.

In the next few years, a variety of battery technologies will be put through the paces to see which chemistry will be safe, have a long life, and can be recycled.

The best known is perhaps Tesla Motors, which just began producing the Roadster sports car with a starting price of about $100,000. But there are several others, offering up different designs and business models to give the internal combustion engine a run for the money.

Lam said consumers are also getting more savvy about green claims from automakers. He said a hybrid with a big 6-liter engine, like the one Lexus is making, is “a joke, an oxymoron.”

(Credit:
CNET Networks)

“It’s difficult to move to plug-in hybrids and make economic sense…You have to have a conventional drive train and a battery,” said Elliot. “When you’re talking about going down-market, you really have to pick a horse.”

But, having both a battery and gasoline engine in one car raises costs, say advocates of all-electric cars. Fisker and Tesla have gone after the luxury market first, catering to environmentally oriented customers willing to pay for the latest technology.

Parallel to technical development in batteries, new companies are trying to innovate with new business models.

But for many consumers at this point, it’s more of a lifestyle statement, argued Fisker. Buying a luxury hybrid electric car is like buying Apple’s iPhone when it first came out. Buyers of some of the first consumer-oriented electric cars will be technology early adopters, eager to be part of the future, he said.

On one point, they agreed: consumers will have more options to kick, or at least cut down on, their gas habit. But beyond that, their views differed on which technology–all-electric, plug-in hybrids, or hybrid electric–would succeed.

Project Better Place, started by ex-SAP executive Shai Agassi, is planning to test a battery-swapping program in Israel, Denmark, and perhaps San Francisco. It now has a prototype of its car, which will be built by Renault.

Phoenix Motorcars, by contrast, is making an all-electric truck and car, as is another supplier, Miles Electric. To get around the range limitation, Phoenix Motorcars is designing its vehicles, based on an Altairnano lithium titanate battery, for use in fleets where the use and range are known.

Click on the photo to see a photo gallery of electric cars at the 2008 New York Auto Show.

Pick a horse
The diversity of approaches reflects the challenges that current battery technology pose.

That may sound like bravado coming from a designer of flashy cars. But when you look at the race to deliver a breakthrough battery-driven car, the field is thick with newcomers.

Click on the photo to see a gallery of electric cars of all shapes under development.

The incumbent automakers are not sitting still, either. Nissan this week said that it will offer an all-electric car in 2010. GM’s Chevy Volt is supposed to come out in 2010, while the other incumbents are pursuing different paths to better mileage.

Fisker likens battery-powered cars to iPhones, a product consumers are willing to shell out extra for, even if it means taking on some risk of being an early adopter.

At a panel of three young car companies–Detroit Electric, Fisker Automotive, and Phoenix Motorcars–at a clean-tech investor conference last week, executives laid out some of the business opportunities and technical hurdles to cleaner cars.

Fisker’s $80,000 Karma, expected for release at the end of next year, will have a custom-designed lithium ion battery that can go 50 miles. That’s a range that covers what most people drive in a day. To ensure a longer range, the car will include a four-cylinder internal combustion gasoline engine that charges the battery.

“It’s a fallacy to say that everyone is going to jump off of oil onto batteries. Then we’ll just have a shortage of lithium and the prices will go up,” said Daniel Elliot, president and CEO of Phoenix Motorcars. “What’s really going on is a fracturing of fuels.”

And in this game, start-ups claim to have the upper hand on the incumbents.

“We’re putting the pressure on the bigger boys,” said Albert Lam, CEO of Detroit Electric, which plans to make electric cars and buses in 2009. “We are the ‘Dells’ of the industry–the smaller boys that have a tremendous opportunity to validate the industry and to be the next big thing.”

Premium green
Apart from all the technical and business challenges remains the question of customer demand.

“This is probably something that has not been seen since we moved from the horse to the engine,” said Henrik Fisker, the CEO of Fisker Automotive, which is designing a luxury hybrid electric car, the Karma.

Aug 23

But if the latest sales data put out by NPD mean anything, Microsoft’s road to victory could be a little harder. That’s because, according to Nintendo, the
Wii in June surpassed the Xbox 360 to become the best-selling next-generation console in the United States.

Additionally, Microsoft and Sony both surely have their own positive spins on NPD’s numbers, though I haven’t gotten those missives yet. Nintendo wins this round, at least, for quickest NPD-related press release (that I got, at least).

According to Nintendo, NPD’s numbers show that during June, the Wii hit 10.9 million units sold in the U.S.

(Credit:
CNET Networks)

Either way, you have to tip your hat to Nintendo for the success of the Wii, and for the console’s having reached the top spot in the U.S. For now, at least. Who knows what the next press release will say.

Of course, in an interview Tuesday, Shane Kim, Microsoft’s corporate vice president of strategy and business development for Microsoft’s interactive entertainment business unit, told me that Mattrick’s declaration applied only to the battle between the Xbox and the PS3. Mattrick himself didn’t make any such clarifications during the press conference.

On Monday morning in Los Angeles, attendees at Microsoft’s E3 press conference heard
Xbox head Don Mattrick “declare” that that video game console would win the so-called next-generation console war.

Nintendo’s Wii is now said to be the top-selling next-generation video game console in the United States, having reached 10.9 million units sold during the month of June.

And in Kim’s defense, it’s true that most people think of the Xbox and the PS3 as being in a different category of video game console than the Wii, despite all three often being lumped together.

In May, Microsoft announced the Xbox had hit 10 million units sold first, a milestone the company said has historically been reached by each console generation’s eventual winner. And in its quarterly earnings release Thursday, Microsoft said it had sold 1.3 million Xboxes during the last quarter. But it’s been clear for some time that the Wii is outselling both the Xbox and Sony’s
PlayStation 3 on a monthly basis. And given that the Xbox has been out a full year longer than the Wii or the PS3, Nintendo’s news is all the more noteworthy.

Aug 23

For those who haven’t replaced with iPhones and bought them near to day 1 last year when the 1.0 iPhone came out, the clock is ticking to replace them. I’ve seen these original 1.0 iPhones with batteries that are deteriorating and many 1.0 iPhone screens and cases that are scratched, rendering them even less valuable once iPhone 2.0 comes out.

With
iPhone 2.0 coming soon, a question I’ve heard many a current iPhone owner wanting to get the next iPhone ask: what do I do with my old one? This emerging question highlights the early-adopter’s plight against the law of diminishing returns. It’s doubtful that a current iPhone will fetch more than $100 on eBay. But you never know. This presupposes that people will dump their old iPhones for a new one, but the incentives are there this time around especially with the lowered price, and given our disposable cell phone culture, it’s more than likely that people will replace. (This leads to other questions: if you plan to get a new iPhone anyway, why would you buy Apple Care when a new iPhone comes out each year? And, now, with an even lower price, why bother?)

Given Apple’s previous willingness to swap out iPhones over this past year, will Apple see a sudden surge of iPhones returned this month before the 1-year warranty window runs out? Will this willingness to accept returns for 1.0 carry over to 2.0 and be as generous? After all, when they replaced my dropped iPhone they said it was for research purposes, presumably for the 2.0 iPhone, but if this carries over to 2.0 iPhones is not clear. With mandatory in-store activation and a lowered price point, it doesn’t seem like 1.0’s goodwill will carry over into 2.0.

In my case, I’ve been a bit luckier as this is my third iPhone which means it’s still relatively ‘new’ (if not refurbished). There hasn’t been noticeable battery deterioration (yet) nor is the iPhone scratched especially after I encased it in plastic - sounds like a good eBay tag, doens’t it?

Aug 23

No, this won’t happen overnight, but the roots are already being planted. Hewlett-Packard has been talking this game for a while and is rapidly becoming a major networking player. Juniper Networks’ entrance into the Ethernet switching market will also accelerate the model. As for Cisco Systems, it has the most to lose but is adjusting its game accordingly. John Chambers & Co. may not want a flat network, but they understand that technology advances are pushing the network in this direction.

1. Wireless support
The new 802.11n IEEE standard is a game changer that may eliminate the need for most wired connections.

For the longest time, networks were built in three tiers: access, aggregation, and core.

Over time, these device-centric changes could alter the way we build networks and greatly impact the networking industry. Packet processing and forwarding decisions will be made throughout the network, not at specific aggregation points alone. As this happens, the network could morph into an intelligent flat fabric rather than today’s hierarchical structure.

3. Performance
Networking equipment combines 10-gigabit Ethernet with incredibly fast system backplanes.

This made a lot of sense back in the old days because of network technology limitations and traffic patterns. But alas, network usage and technology have radically changed since then. Network packets carry all sorts of traffic consisting of chatty protocols, voice, and multimedia. As for networking technology, many historical limitations are fading away. Today’s networking devices have superior capabilities in four key areas:

2. Port density
A 24-port access switch can join others in a stackable or virtual configuration. The result? Tons of ports for connectivity.

4. Intelligence
Devices can easily combine Layer 2 switching, Layer 3 routing, and a host of other packet processing capabilities.

Aug 23

Update 2: Vreel is getting more servers and should be officially “re-launching” soon. We’ll keep you posted.

Like its predecessor, one of the service’s strong suits is that it uses DivX, a codec that’s not as popular as Adobe’s Flash for Web video, but beat it to market for delivering high-resolution videos and is largely the format of choice for videos found on sites like The Pirate Bay. Since then, Flash has caught up technologically, but high-resolution videos have not quite reached the mainstream, only popping up on sites like Dailymotion, Vimeo, and in a gallery on Hulu. The user-uploaded videos already filling up Vreel’s servers are beautiful (albeit mostly illegal).

The short clip I uploaded earlier today came from my digital camera and was converted from AVI to DivX with no noticeable loss in quality. The one caveat there is that, to see it, users have to install the DivX Web player in their browser, the same thing you have to do with Flash and YouTube. DivX’s player, however, has a few tricks up its sleeve. For one, you can pop out any video to its original quality, which on some widescreen videos looks just great. It’s also got a much more complex options menu for every clip that lets you do fast forward and rewind, and even save the clip if you have a premium version of the player–the same kind of things you get with Apple’s QuickTime.

Update: Oops, looks like we helped take the site down. Removing links for the time being–will put them back up when the site returns.

High-quality videos on Vreel shine. You can even view them in close to native resolution with a pop-out player.

Update 3: Everything is back to normal. Links are back.

When I put together a small comparison test of video services earlier this year, an overwhelming number of people got on me about not including Stage6, a side project of the people behind the popular DivX codec to showcase what their technology was capable of. Shortly thereafter, Stage6 shut its doors in a rather dramatic fashion–giving users mere days to find somewhere else to host their high-resolution videos.

Unfortunately, the one thing missing is a way to embed the clip on other sites, so if you want to see how it looks beyond the screenshot below, you’ll have to go here

(Credit:
CNET Networks)

That was in February though, and since then a group of half a dozen developers has put together their own solution, called Vreel. Originally planned to launch back in March, it opened up its doors this morning.

The service is allowing users to upload gargantuan video files by most standards. The current cap is 1GB, which is what many free Web storage services offer as their entire limit. I’m told users will be able to upload even larger sizes in the future. The best thing is that there’s no time limit, so as long as your video is under the size cap, it can be as long as you want. Considering the news about YouTube extending its video length, this is a necessary move.

Aug 23

Worst comes to worse, there’s always the free OpenOffice.org.

• Wait awhile to install it. The idea being, if something in the service pack causes a lot of grief, Microsoft may have a fix available by the time you need it. Service Pack 3 was first released four months ago, so I wouldn’t expect big problems. Still, it will now be installed on many more computers, so something new may crop up. There is no right answer for how long to wait, but considering the service pack is not very new, I’d give it a couple weeks at least.

See a summary of all my Defensive Computing postings.

On February 28, Microsoft started to distribute Service Pack 3 for Office 2003 via Microsoft Update. As I noted earlier, it’s safer to avoid new software, including new bug fixes and new service packs (a big collection of bug fixes).

In light of all this, I suggest the following for dealing with Office 2003 Service Pack 3:

In the current issue* of the Windows Secrets newsletter, Susan Bradley points out a problem with service packs for
Microsoft Office: there is no undo. If, for example, Service Pack 3 causes a problem, you can’t roll back to Service Pack 2; instead, you have to uninstall Office 2003 and reinstall it.

Regardless of service packs, anyone running Office 2003 on Windows XP should run it in restricted mode with DropMyRights.

• To prepare for problems, make a disk image backup of the entire Windows partition before installing the service pack. I’ll have more to say about disk image backups in the future.

*There is a free and a paid version of the newsletter. This article is in the paid version, which is why I can’t link to it.

• To prepare for reinstalling Office, make sure you can find your Office 2003 CD. For good luck, check that the disc is still readable, put it in a computer, and browse around a handful of folders. If Office 2003 was pre-installed on the computer and you don’t have a CD, then you’ve learned a valuable lesson about buying pre-installed software.

« Previous Entries